The Trial of Pink Pussy Hat

I am a white liberal feminist. I wore a pink pussy hat to the 2017 Women’s March. And while I am not ashamed to claim the former, the later admission does make my cheeks burn a bit in retrospect. Like the many white women who donned pink pussy hats, especially for the first march, I was eager to show solidarity. I was high on “we are in this together!” yet didn’t pause to examine how my enthusiasm could discourage others from participating.

Symbols speak volumes. They say a lot about inclusion and exclusion. Their simplicity and accessibility make them the perfect packages for covert meaning, whether intentioned or not.

Symbols, therefore, require interrogation.

Court Transcript

Defense: Please state and spell your name for the jury.

Pink Pussy Hat: My name is Pink Pussy Hat. P-I-N-K. P-U-S-S-Y. H-A-T.

Defense: Thank you, Ms. Hat. Tell us, what do you do?

PPH: Well, I am a hat. A pink one. And I have small little cat ears. Like a pussy cat.

Defense: And what is your significance?

PPH: As far as I can tell, I am supposed to celebrate female genitalia. More than that, actually. To take back the word “pussy” after President Trump’s remarks about it.

Defense: To what remarks are you referring?

PPH: You know, when Trump said “grab ’em by the pussy.”

Defense: I see. Ms. Hat, what is your goal?

PPH: To keep women’s heads warm during the women’s marches. That’s what I’ve been doing since 2017. And providing a common rallying point for women. At least, I have been trying to do that. Last, it is a way for women to feel involved in the marches, even if they can’t be there in person.

Defense: Thank you, Ms. Hat. No further questions, Your Honor.

Judge: Your witness, Ms. Prosecutor.

Prosecution: Thank you, Your Honor. Ms. Hat, you say your goal is provide a common rallying point for women, is that correct?

PPH: Yes, that’s right.

Prosecution: But it is true, Ms. Hat, that you don’t really mean all women, do you?

PPH: No. I mean, yes. I do mean all women.

Prosecution: But you are pink correct?

PPH: Yes.

Prosecution: Are all pussies pink, Ms. Hat?

PPH: I’m not sure what you —

Prosecution: Do pussies come in other colors, Ms. Hat?

PPH: Sure, there are many —

Prosecution: So, pink is a rather exclusive color for a pussy, isn’t that right?

PPH: Umm, I am not sure what you mean by exclusive. . . .

Prosecution: Only a white woman’s pussy would be pink, correct?

PPH: Well, I don’t think any pussies are really pink. Maybe more flesh-colored, whatever that might be. I think pink is meant to be a symbolic color, more like “girl power,” I guess.

Prosecution: Ms. Hat, let’s leave color aside for a moment. You are a “pussy” hat, correct?

PPH: Yes.

Prosecution: Meant to, in your words, “celebrate female genitalia,” correct?

PPH: Yes.

Prosecution: And that is how you define women, Ms. Hat, by the presence of a pussy, correct?

PPH: I’m sorry, what?

Prosecution: You just told us that you are a “pussy” hat — Isn’t it true your very nature prohibits recognition of women in all their forms?

PPH: I don’t . . . I hope not. It’s just a pussy. Like, a pussy cat. See my ears?

Prosecution: Do you believe the concept of “woman” is defined only by sex — by one’s physical organs?

PPH: No, I love trans people! Is that where this is going? I have a friend who is trans!

Prosecution: Forgive me for my skepticism, Ms. Hat. Is the jury to believe you are simply naïve? You intended to co-opt the women’s march from the moment you were knit, didn’t you? You are a symbol of the white woman’s feminism! Proof of white women’s — -

Defense: Objection! Your Honor!

Judge: Ms. Prosecutor. Make your point without haranguing the witness.

Prosecution: Yes, Your Honor. Ms. Hat. Isn’t it true you were designed by two privileged white women?

PPH: No, actually. Well, I am not sure how they self-identify. You’d have to ask them. Krista Suh is the daughter of a Korean-American dad and a Chinese-American mom. I don’t know about Jayna Zweiman. I know all four of her grandparents emigrated from Eastern Europe, but —

Prosecution: Thank you. Ms. Hat, you were present at the 2017 women’s march, were you not?

PPH: Yes.

Prosecution: And the 2018 and 2019 marches, correct?

PPH: Yes.

Prosecution: Do you plan to be at the 2020 march?

PPH: I think so. I mean, it depends on if people want to wear me. It’s up to them.

Prosecution: And you must have seen reactions to your presence at these events — do you seriously maintain you have no idea you may be seen as offensive?

Defense: Your Honor, the witness never said that!

Judge: I’ll allow it.

PPH: I guess I can understand. But I never meant to make anyone feel bad. I want to help women come together.

Prosecution: You want to help only certain women come together, isn’t that right?

PPH: No! I want all women to march together! To support each other! I swear that is all I want! I guess I just thought, because I am a cute little hat . . . I mean, I can’t really hurt anyone, right?

Prosecution: Ms. Hat, are you aware last year organizers in Humboldt County, California cancelled their march because they were afraid the march would be, and I quote: “overwhelmingly white”?

PPH: Oh. No, I didn’t know that.

Prosecution: In fact, these types of concerns have plagued the march since 2017, correct?

PPH: Umm, yeah. I have heard there is a bit of . . . um, conversation. Did they really cancel that march last year?

Prosecution: And there has been in-fighting and conflicting ideas for the purpose of the national Women’s March among its leadership. You’re aware of that, too, correct?

PPH: I’d heard that. But that is ok, right? I mean, isn’t there always some bickering among different people and groups in times of change? Have you seen Hamilton?

Prosecution: Ms. Hat —

PPH: I’m sorry. I never meant to ruin anything. I wanted to do some good. I guess I just. . . . I just didn’t know.

Prosecution: You didn’t know you could be seen as exclusionary, is that correct?

PPH: Yes. I didn’t think —

Prosecution: That’s right. You didn’t think. And we need more from our social movements, don’t we Ms. Hat?

Defense: Your Honor, this is getting argumentative, not to mention beyond the scope of my client’s purview.

Prosecution: Not at all, Your Honor. Intersectional identities are now a foundation of social movements. We have to expect — we must expect — anyone involved to practice awareness and sensitivity.

Defense: I am not sure that is a fair standard, Your Honor. Isn’t participation, in some cases, a precursor to greater awareness? The law doesn’t specify order or causality.

Judge: I am inclined to agree with the defense. Sustained. Ask a different question, Ms. Prosecutor.

Prosecution: Yes, Your Honor. Ms. Hat, did you know many different women, women of a variety of racial and ethnic identities, as well as people with a range of gender identities, would be attending the Women’s March in 2017?

PPH: Umm . . . yes? I guess I didn’t really focus on that.

Prosecution: And when you say “focus” you mean it wasn’t a concern, is that correct.

PPH: Uh, yeah. I guess.

Prosecution: So that is a “yes”?

PPH: Yes.

Prosecution: Thank you. I have no further questions for this witness.

Defense: A brief redirect, Your Honor.

Judge: Proceed.

Defense: Ms. Hat, what are your intentions concerning the Women’s March?

PPH: To . . . to try to . . . to be something women could rally around.

Defense: Who do you have in mind to rally? Or, what type of woman did you hope to rally?

PPH: No one type of woman. Really. There isn’t just one type of woman. I get that. I just wanted to be kinda, you know, funny. Irreverent. I’m just a pink pussy hat.

Defense: No further questions, Your Honor.

--

--

--

Social scientist; devoted to designing spaces, policies, & programs for all women.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Cherryl Pigues Crite remembers ‘as plain as day’ Black Mondays, Dr. King

A (Brief) History of Gender Norms

What does race have to do with religion and cults?

An Open Letter & A Call for True Healing Justice

WAPPP Summer internship

MEN : The Underdog Victims

T​his is a very interesting time (to say the least) in the world.

The Ideal Cop

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Virginia Santy, Ph.D.

Virginia Santy, Ph.D.

Social scientist; devoted to designing spaces, policies, & programs for all women.

More from Medium

How Different is Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ from our world?

My Tryst With Shame

It’s me wondering about HUMANITY

A Love Letter to Feminist Movements